國土計畫在法理上是指導各級土地使用計畫的上位綱要計畫。
全國國土計劃設定上限值及期待值，縣市國土計劃負責農業發展區及城鄉發展區的整體規劃及執行把關。
土地治理模式: 尊重地方自治及成長需求，設定人口、產業用地及農地總量為參考值，而非絕對值。
審議的重點: 以歷史共業，農地誤用、工廠自行發照、個案型變更等問題解決的必要部署，包括全面納管違章工廠，住商用地謹慎增加，產業用地優先提供等。
規劃及計畫的可貴在彈性回應機制，很可惜地，歷史共業使然，計畫的執行充斥著法條穩定性的算計，且誤以為土地治理必須在全國一致性框架下為之。
回到基本面，我們真的知道台灣國土發展的現況嗎?我們在都市計畫區與非都土地累積的作為，真的全面納管了嗎?
假設我們不清楚，假設有人選舉的時候故意講說: 高雄又老又窮，誰來證明或者反駁這樣的論點呢?
土地利用現況理解很難嗎?土地使用調查是高科技嗎?
除了土調，我們又對台灣人認知多少?台灣人在隱私權的保障下，很容易被穿透嗎?
2020/5/7
Google's sister firm Sidewalk Labs has scrapped a plan to build a smart city in Canada, citing complications caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
For several years it had pursued ambitions to build a digital-first city in Toronto "from the internet up".
Chief executive Dan Doctoroff blamed "unprecedented economic uncertainty" for abandoning the plan.
The project had proved controversial and Sidewalk Labs had already been forced to scale back its ambitions.
In a blog post, Mr Doctoroff said: "As unprecedented economic uncertainty has set in around the world, and in the Toronto real estate market, it has become too difficult to make the 12-acre project financially viable without sacrificing core parts of the plan we had developed together with Waterfront Toronto to build a truly inclusive, sustainable community.
"I believe the ideas we have developed over the last two-and-a-half years will represent a meaningful contribution to the work of tackling big urban problems, particularly in the areas of affordability and sustainability."
The vision was to have a city full of technology, from autonomous cars to innovative ways of collecting rubbish, and hundreds of sensors collecting data on air quality and the movements of people. Buildings would be sustainable and built in radical new ways, and cycle lanes would be heated.
But some questioned how Sidewalk Labs had won the contract. When it emerged that it planned to develop a much larger site than originally stated, a lobby group of citizens opposing the plans emerged, asking why they would want to be "lab rats" in a digital experiment.
An independent panel was set up to scrutinise its plans and released a report suggesting some of its ideas were "tech for tech's sake", and potentially unnecessary.
Sidewalk Labs was eventually given a tentative green light to continue its plan, but it was heavily scaled back from the 190-acre site it wanted to work with to a 12-acre piece of land.
It was also told that any data it collected from its sensors would have to become a public asset.
Stephen Diamond is chairman of Waterfront Toronto, the body set up to oversee development of the site.
Reacting to Sidewalk's announcement, he said: "While this is not the outcome we had hoped for, Waterfront Toronto offers thanks and appreciation to Sidewalk Labs for its vision, effort and the many commitments that both the company and its employees have made to the future of Toronto.
"Quayside remains an excellent opportunity to explore innovative solutions to affordable housing, improved mobility, climate change and several other urban challenges that Toronto - and cities around the world - must address in order to continue to grow and succeed."
In his blog, Dan Doctoroff said the firm continued to invest in start-ups "working on everything from robotic furniture to digital electricity".
"We continue to work internally on factory-made mass timber construction that can improve housing affordability"
留言列表
